MCNP Example: PWR Fuel Pin Model

Problem Description

This example models a typical PWR fuel pin cell: a UO₂ fuel pellet, helium-filled gap, Zircaloy-4 cladding, and water moderator — all enclosed by a reflective equivalent cylinder that simulates the infinite lattice environment.

Key Dimensions

Radial dimensions:

  • Fuel outer radius: 0.4095 cm
  • Gap outer radius: 0.4178 cm
  • Clad outer radius: 0.4750 cm
  • Equivalent cell radius: 0.7108 cm

Material densities:

  • UO₂ fuel: 10.4 g/cm³
  • Helium gap: 0.0001 g/cm³
  • Zircaloy-4: 6.56 g/cm³
  • Water: 0.998 g/cm³

Complete Input File

Hover over any highlighted section to see what it does and why. Tap on mobile.

mcnp — hover sections to explore
PWR Fuel Pin Cell Model
c ---- Cell Cards ----
c cell mat density surfaces params
1 1 -10.4 -1 imp:n=1 $ UO2 Fuel
2 2 -0.0001 1 -2 imp:n=1 $ Helium Gap
3 3 -6.56 2 -3 imp:n=1 $ Zircaloy-4 Cladding
4 4 -0.998 3 -4 imp:n=1 $ Water Moderator
 
c ---- Surface Cards ----
1 cz 0.4095 $ Fuel Radius
2 cz 0.4178 $ Gap Outer Radius
3 cz 0.4750 $ Clad Outer Radius
*4 cz 0.7108 $ Reflective boundary (* = reflecting)
 
c ---- Data Cards ----
c Materials (positive fractions = atom, negative = weight)
m1 92235.70c 0.04 $ 4% enriched UO2 (atom fractions)
92238.70c 0.96
8016.70c 2.0
m2 2004.70c 1.0 $ Helium fill gas
m3 40090.70c -0.5145 $ Zircaloy-4 (weight fractions)
40091.70c -0.1122
40092.70c -0.1715
40094.70c -0.1738
40096.70c -0.0280
m4 1001.70c 2.0 $ Light water (atom ratios)
8016.70c 1.0
mt4 lwtr.10t $ S(a,b) thermal scattering
 
c kcode: neutrons/cycle k-guess skip total
kcode 5000 1.0 50 250
ksrc 0 0 0
 
c Tallies
f4:n 1 $ Track-length flux in fuel cell
e4 1e-9 1e-8 1e-7 1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2
0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $ Energy bin upper bounds (MeV)
f7:n 1 $ Fission energy deposition in fuel
 
c Output control
prdmp j 300 1 2

Annotated MCNP Input

Hover over any highlighted section to see a detailed explanation. Tap on mobile.

Cell cards (4 regions)
Cylindrical surfaces (1–3)
Reflective boundary (*4)
UO₂ fuel material
Helium fill gas
Zircaloy-4 cladding
Water + S(α,β) scattering
KCODE settings
KSRC initial source
F4/E4 flux spectrum tally
F7 fission power tally
Output control

Expected Results

Physics

  • k typically 1.3–1.5 for fresh 4% fuel with this H/HM ratio
  • Thermal flux peaks in water, dips in fuel (self-shielding)
  • F7 fission heat concentrated in the fuel pellet

Statistics

  • k-effective uncertainty: ~0.0002–0.0005
  • F4 flux spectrum: good statistics in thermal/epithermal bins
  • All statistical checks should pass with 200 active cycles

Analysis Considerations

  • The cylindrical outer boundary is an approximation of the actual square pin cell geometry
  • The reflective BC gives k — not keff of a finite reactor
  • Room-temperature cross sections (.70c) are not suitable for hot operating conditions
  • Thermal scattering (mt4 lwtr.10t) is essential for accurate k-effective

Model Variations

Design Studies

  • Vary enrichment (2–5%) for reactivity coefficients
  • Adjust pin pitch to study H/HM effects
  • Change water density to model void coefficient

Advanced Analysis

  • Add burnable absorber coating on fuel surface
  • Apply temperature-dependent cross sections (TMP card)
  • Use BURN card for depletion calculation